Impedance Balanced Outputs

Copyright 1998 by Richard A. Chinn, all rights reserved. Revised June 2000 & October 2009.

I抳e always been interested in transformerless output circuits. Over the years, I抳e watched and played with the variations that have appeared: the chain of inverters, the cross-coupled circuits, etc. and while each of them solved a particular problem, none was as foolproof as a decent transformer driven with a high-current capability amplifier.

Transformers have gotten a bad rap in the audio world. For as many problems as they solve, they create an equal number. Sometimes, a transformer is an elegant but simple solution to a nasty problem. Often it is unexcelled. But with users clamoring for lower cost products, it was an easy decision to frame the transformer as a sonic pollution dump while cutting out a significant cost item.

Remember: marketing hype nothwithstanding, you the consumer pay for every cost incurred by the manufacturer in making your favorite gadget. There is no free lunch!

The Problem

The issue of electronics-challenged users connecting the output to both balanced and unbalanced inputs has always been particularly vexing. The three commonly used solutions are the chain of inverters circuit, the cross-coupled circuit, and ground sensing. All of these work to one degree or another, and each has an weak point that can be troublesome.

The Chain of Inverters

The chain of inverters circuit emulates a grounded center-tapped transformer. This is very likely the most popular circuit used today. When used with an unbalanced input by connecting the low-side output to ground, the chain of inverters circuit injects current (usually distorted) into your ground system. If everything is free of pin 1 trouble, then this is probably OK. If the unbalancing happens at the load, then this ground current is flowing through your snake system, which often causes trouble. This unbalancing act also severely taxes the circuitry driving the grounded output. Another problem with this circuit is a 慺ree?6-dB of voltage gain.

The Cross-Coupled Circuit

The cross-coupled output emulates a floating transformer winding. Unlike the transformer, this circuit demands that it be unbalanced at the source. Heaven help you if there is a pin 1 problem designed into the unit抯 output connector. Unbalancing at the load causes instability. The good news is that the voltage gain is constant, balanced or unbalanced. The Analog Devices SSM2142 and Burr-Brown DRV134 IC parts use this circuit.

Ground Sensing

The ground sensing circuit attempts to make whatever difference in potential between the near equipment ground and the far equipment ground into a common-mode signal. To one degree or another, this usually works. It is immune to having its low side output shorted to ground. Sometimes it makes matters worse. DBX, TAPCO and Dolby have all used this circuit at one time or another.

Let's Blame the Manufacturers

All of this is exacerbated by most manufacturer抯 omission of any discussion of output stage topology in their manuals. Of course, if they were considerate enough to include a schematic (not often), then anyone with a bit of circuit smarts can see this out at a glance. Some manufacturers now include a discussion of balanced and unbalanced interface issues along with specific recommendations for their unit. I believe that they should also describe their unit抯 input and output circuit topologies.

A Solution

As an equipment designer, I抳e agonized over this problem for some time now. One solution is to simply provide two connectors: one marked balanced, and one marked unbalanced. This works, and doesn抰 really take a rocket scientist to figure out (good when the user refuses to read the g!@**! manual. On the other hand, it requires two connectors along with more PCB space and panel space (both cost money, and panel space may be limited). I抳e also gone so far as to insist on using TRS connectors for the unbalanced outputs, wiring the ring contact to circuit ground. This way, connecting the gear using a TRS cable into a balanced input works just fine. This is a win in more ways than one, both for the user and for the manufacturer. The manufacturer gets to buy one less different part and the user gets a jack that accepts either a TRS or a TS plug and connects each one correctly.

Impedance Balancing

The people at Mackie Designs have played with a scheme that they called "Impedance Balanced" for phone jack outputs. At first, I gasped and sputtered. But after thinking about the problem, I抳e come to embrace this as the best solution, especially when you don抰 have dual output connectors (if product cost is a factor, then every nickle and dime counts, and excess connectors are a great place to shave costs).

Simply stated, you use a TRS jack for the connector, and you connect the ring contact to ground through the same resistance as used for the build-out resistor on the tip contact. From the line抯 standpoint, the circuit is balanced, driven from a grounded center-tap source. Only half of the circuit is driven from an audio standpoint. It doesn抰 matter what sort of plug the user inserts, either way is optimum for that case. For the unbalanced case, no ground current flows.

If you're building this into a piece of gear, then take the time to try to figure out what the value of the buildout resistor is from the signal source, then match that value from the ring side to ground. If there is a coupling capacitor, then add another of equal value in series with the resistor going to the ring contact.

Even if you can't build this into the gear, you can take advantage of the balanced input by running the balanced input all the way to the source, and then connecting the hot side to signal and the cold side and shield to ground. While not as good as impedance balancing, this is far superior to treating the whole mess as an unbalanced interface.

From the balanced input抯 standpoint, there are equal impedances from both sides of the line to ground. This results in the best CMR performance, especially if close-tolerance resistors are used at the output side.  From an induced noise standpoint (the kind of noise that a balanced input is supposed to reject) this is what counts. There is no level difference if used with a balanced or unbalanced input. The circuit noise is actually 3 dB less than either of the other two balanced line drivers. This is way better than unbalancing the input at the input jack and handling the interface as unbalanced output driving unbalanced input.

The really important issue is that both sides of the line see the same impedance to ground. It is far less important that the line be driven symetrically (i.e. both sides antiphase).

Lest you think that this is some sort of half-baked solution, take note that both AKG and Neumann use this circuit for their transformerless microphones. If it抯 good enough for them at microphone signal levels, I抦 more than comfortable with it at line level.

doug self has a more math intensive explanation on his

乐优彩票天天红单下载 乐优彩票登入,备用,官方网址 乐优彩票网址是多少 乐信pc下载 乐优炫彩app 乐优炫彩app下载 乐优炫彩app天天红单 乐优炫彩天天红单 乐优炫彩官网 乐优炫彩彩票app下载